The end of a band happens in different ways. Some carry on playing for decades, with no notable demise until they disappear from existance. Others go out with a bang, at the peak of their time. The latter applies to Manchester duo Crywank, a band formed at the turn of the decade who, after ten years of providing us with great shows and even better albums recently announced the pending dissolution of the band.
Despite their top five songs alone having over 13 million plays, theyâre a band that may have passed you by. Theyâre also a band that you mayâve inadvertently listened to â either intrigued by the fragility in content, the delicate melodies or simply coming across a name that, in the early 2010âs, wouldâve caused a reaction. Itâs an unconventional name for an unconventional band with an unconventional frontman. The name came from a cruel nickname given to founder, vocalist and guitarist James Clayton, based on what his friends thought he was doing when he wouldnât leave his room in his underground flat, aptly named âDa Bunkerâ. âI was reading into debasement a lot at that time and got into a comfortable place being the butt of jokes and humiliating myself in front of others for their amusementâ says Clayton. The night Crywank started, Clayton and friend Thomas Saunders stayed up all night, with Saunders teaching him two basic chords. By the end of the night, Clayton had written two songs and requiring an alias for the project, the decision was easy. âCrywank accurately described what I was doing with my music, and what my intent was with it. That being a cathartic exorcise; releasing the most over-dramatic elements of my emotions, whilst also trying to maintain an awareness of the triteness and performativity that comes from being a solo songwriter who largely sings about themselves.â
While itâs a name that has potentially cost them gigs or exposure opportunities â âWhen we first started all people used to say was âyouâll never get anywhere with a band name like Crywankâ, now that weâve found some weird kind of version of success people tell us âyou only get listeners because of the band nameâ â the reality is it suits them perfectly. Thereâs a dichotomy between the snarky humour and the open-wound honesty they bounce between, song to song. Self-deprecating candor that mocks their own feelings and points to their own flaws while managing to twist the sad grimace into a smile is an almost impossible trick, but itâs one Clayton is able to pull off with ease numerous times throughout every album. For those who donât know them or their discography intimately, those who have either listened to their more well-known tracks or who donât know Crywank at all, Clayton believes the biggest problem with the name is it conceptualises them. âI understand how people who only listen to our bigger songs online can see us as a serious acoustic emo band though, and I can see why people who have only seen us live can take us as a satirical acoustic punk band. I donât think we are either.â
Despite their aversion to using the term, Crywank are, at their core, a DIY band â and I say this knowing itâll likely upset and offend Clayton and bandmate Dan Watson but hear me out. Historically, theyâre a band who self-finance, self-promote and essentially push everything themselves, with an ardent fanbase who are both heavily invested in their music, but also the people â the two band members and the larger Crywank family of listeners and supporters who have stood by them throughout. But the term âDIYâ has largely changed since they were first starting. It no longer means âDo It Yourselfâ â instead, itâs become a scene, heavily pushed by numerous publications (both major and minor, ourselves included) to mean âsocially conscious pop punkâ. You could use the term âIndieâ in a similar way; no longer is it in âindependent musicâ, now it includes the likes of Oasis and Arctic Monkeys, signed to major record labels but with a very distinctive style that matches.
Itâs a fair argument, and one that Clayton sticks to, being strongly in the habit of rejecting a label thatâs thrown around in such a laissez-faire way. âThe term DIY is to empower people at the bottom who are literally doing all the elements themselves. We are so privileged to have had the response we have so we donât need to use it anymore.â Itâs an incredibly humble way to perceive it, particularly being unsigned and self-managed, theyâve appointed themselves as âanti-folkâ due to their relative success.
So much so that theyâve been able to embark on a self-financed world tour. Thatâs right â a WORLD tour.  Starting in New Zealand and Australia, ably organised by their friend Geneva Valek at Stitches Music, before subsequently moving on to South Asia, South America and dates throughout the US and Canada, itâs incredible that, for a band who doesnât get any media attention and struggles to book shows in the UK, they are able to successfully tour worldwide and turn a profit. As expected, the South Asia leg has sunk both a lot of money and time, with Clayton booking future dates and venues through his phone with questionable wifi access, itâs a big commitment to turn up in a country and expect to be able to play â and yet that fanbase allows them to do so. Unfortunately, due to the terrible Covid-19 pandemic, they were forced to cancel their tour whilst in Canada, leaving them in a hole of around ÂŁ6,000 and no flights back to the UK, having to resort to the love and generosity of their fanbase to help fund their return.